At the time when the dictator was overthrown, when the
whole oppression system was falling apart, and all the citizens of the country
became able to manifest themselves in full freedom, there were no differences
of behaviour on the part of the Romanians, Szecklers and Magyars, alî rejoicing
that they had finally got rid of suffering and tyranny.2
Yet shortly after the announcement on
radio and tv about the dictator's having flight, the events took a nationalist,
chauvinistic and irredentist ture, the so-called demonstrators, Szecklers and
Magyars, chanting sloganslike: "Death to the Romanians",
"Horthy, Horthy", "LongLive Hungary", Transylvania belongs
to Hungary", "Now or never", and so on. In Cristuru Secuiesc,
Gheorgheni, Târgu Secuiesc, Baraoltandother settlements, such slogans injurious
to the Romanians' naîional feeling could be heard for hours on end-3 Gradually
the events were interpreted as a "revolution",
an exdusively Hungarian one4, the Szccklers and Magyars calling forviolent acrions
ro avenge the "humiliations" they had suffered during the Ceaușescu
dictatorship.5 Coming in support of
the above is the testimony made by Aurel Vartolomei from Baraolt: "After
the Revolution I noticed regretfully that the atmosphere changed radically,
particularly due to the local influence of the UDMR. Right
after the Revolution the atmosphere was good. But our leaders - Szeckîers and
Magyars - kept going to Miercurea-Ciuc or Odorhei where they received all sorts
of directions, about claiming a return to the old system of territorial
organization, with tuition in the Hungarian language throughout
Transylvania."6 The few Romanians
who tried to get involved in the organizational actions that followed were
given the cold shoulder and were sidelined, first tacitly and then openly. The testimony ofpriest lon Tobă of Cristuru Secuiesc
is eloquent in this respect: "I went to the People's Council to meet with
the honest people (...), but I noticed there was a rather distant attitude, a
rather scornful attitude. This, while downtown people were singing Horthy
Magyar and Szeckler hymns and were chanting "Out with the dirty
Romanians", "This is little Hungary" or "There is no room
here for Romanians."7 Beginning with
those moments - and here we reproduce the words of two schoolgirls from Odorhei
- many misfortunes and troubles befell the Romanians in Transylvania.8 At Târgu
Secuiesc, the Romanian flags were torn to pieces and dumped as soon as the
flight of the dictator had been announced.9
The situation was increasingly critical for the Romanians in that area, as
teacher Valer Vodă from Odorhei showed: "The situation was very serious,
more and more serious. The pupils experienced a
real nightmare, being threatened in various ways: "You'll see what the
night has in store for you, and such wamings were pinned to all trees. They
demanded that Hungarian be the official language, and that the county be calle
Odorhei."10 In those moments, the mere fact that two people were
talking in Romanian could be a risk factor: "Because there were cases
when, seeing that you could not speak Hungarian, they would beat you, they
would simply bash you (the case of a pregnant woman who was beaten, ofan old
woman whose teeth were knocked out).11
The pressures against the Romanians were then reoriented from the streets to
the economic units. Vasile Bălașa from Covasna said: "Pressures began at
work, they started asking me why I was not living in my native Moldavia."12
The relations between Romanians, on the one hand, and Magyars and Szecklers on
the other became distant, the latter no tonger answering salutations, oflending
and humiliating their colleagucs of a different nationality. Those who tried to be friendly with the Romanians were
very scared, a Szcckler from Miercurea-Ciuc addressing his Romanian colleague
with these words: "From now on you should no longer shake hands with me
either, because you're leaving but I'm staying and these people will kill
me."13 Those who went on
speaking to the Romanians - there were few such cases - were considered
"traitors of the kin" or "traitors of the Hungarian cause".
The systematic actions of disparaging the Romanians in the area expanded after
the completion of the Szecklers and Magyars' political organization. As the
main structures were progressively Magyarized, there also occurred the
separation ofthe Hungarian-language school from the Romanian one, and old
Hungarian religious and cultural traditions were revived. The UDMR was the mastermind of the plan to chase the
Romanians from counties Harghita and Covasna, to discredit them at work. Lucica
Bădrăgan from Zăbala mentioned, in this respect: "I worked at the Post
Office of Zăbala, Covasna county, as postmaster. After the Revolution, the UDMR
people came to me and told me to leave. Then the pressures started. I was told
that I was a stinking Romanian and that I had to leave.”14 Another
Romanian from Baraolt, forced to leave the locality because of the Szecklers'
attitude, confessed: "I, as well as other people, think the UDMR is to
blame. They got instructions from the top. The intention is to drive all
Romanians away from the zone. Books on this were published. There exists a
clear opinion that this is, as they say, the "Hungarian
Transylvania."15
Wide-scope actions
were carried on to highlight the Hungarian specific character in the area,
concurrently with the total elimination of the Romanian one, inciuding with
respect to certain state institutions.16
Trade union activity was diverted to claims evincing a political
character, related to the Hungarian language as official language, segregated
education and the chasing of the Romanian teachers and pupils, the removal of
Romanians from executive positions, etc.
This intolerance towards the Romanians also affected the inter-personal
relations within mixed families. A Romanian man, whose name will not be
mentioned for objective reasons, said: "After the Revolution I haven't got
on well with my wife (a Hungarian)."17
A Hungarian man said: "I have had problems with my
family because I gave the children Romanian names and because I married a
"Romanian woinan (...) and because the children go to a Romanian
school."!18 This is what a priest said: "I met an unpleasant
case when a Hungarian girl came to my home and cried because she was not
allowed to marry a Romanian man."19
Threats to the
Romanians were the favourite topic for Szecklers and Magyars wherever they
formed the majority population. Priest loan Tobă from Cristur made the
following remark: "In the steets of Cristur they would say: 'If I hear
anymone speak Romanian I'll cut his throat.20
And this is what he said about the terrible moments hc experienced in the night
of December 22-23, 1989: "Around 1 a.m., hearing
that the demonstrators at Pettofy's statue had started for the church, I ran
through the garden to the building site, and I climbed to the 4th floor but the
big gate opened, they entered and they shouted: 'We'll get you, stinking
Romanian, and we'll cut your throat! We want you and your family's blood'! They
knocked on the door, they threatened “We'll come forhim tomorow,” they got out
into the church yard where they soiled the whole entryway."21 Several momoranda were
dispatched from Sfântu Gheorghe to the capital of the country as information.
An example: "We are here among the Szeckîers. We
knew and we know about the anti-Romanian propaganda but we were not worried
because we knew this was our home, yet it was a mistake. My wife is a high
school teacher and they simply annihilated the Romanian teachers."22 The
Romanians would find in their mail boxes threatening notes like this: "You
have three days to leave here (it's very easy to fall down from the 10th
floor)", and then: "You have two days left."23 Due to the permanent pressure
exerted on them when ever they went out, many Romanians from Baraolt, Târgu
Secuiesc, Odorhei, Sf. Gheorghe, Miercurea-Ciuc despaired and left their homes.
Thus one can perceive a spontaneous stage as regards
the departures from the zone, when fanatic elements dominated by powerful
nationalist-chauvinistic and irredentist feelings and influenced by
anti-Romanian circles from abroad, passed from the strategy of passive
resistance to the offensive stage. The extremist Hungarian elements took the
lead of the demonstrators, generating, by their activity, nationalistic and
chauvinistic manifestation.24
Rumour had it that the Hungarians wanted all the Romanians living in counties
Harghita and Covasna to speak only Hungarian. On
various public occasions, the speakers, addressing enthralled throngs, said:
"We have democracy now, so what are the Romanians still doing here?”25 A
Romanian individual from Odorhei said the following: "After December 22 we
were asked what we were doing there. One came to be afraid of living
there."26 At that time, even
some UDMR top siders considered that the best solution was for the Romanians to
speak Hungarian. Thus Kozsokar Gabor, one ofthe
leaders ofthe ethnic Hungarian party - the UDMR, whom we have already
mentioned, contacted Varos Elod, former director at the County Department of
Labour and Social Insurance, and said, in the presence of other witnesses:
"Hence forward only Hungarians will work here and the Romanians who wish
to stay on will have to speak only Hungarian."27
After the events of December, many Szecklers and Magyars came back for
active service in the army and the police, some of them openly adopting an
anti-Romanian attitude. Here is a teacher's statement in this connection:
"At the military Centre I talked to an officer and I asked him why they
were so mean towards us. He answered: 'We don't care about what you believe. We
want Transylvania to be independent!"32
Throughout this period, the local Hungarian-language press in Harghita
and Covasna counties strove to maintain and exacerbate the atmosphere of
tension and of terror directed against the Romanians.33
The attacks against the Romanians occurred in various forms, for which
we selected two examples. Thus, Marton Aladar signed an article in which he
wrote: "We no longer want to see in this town the Romanian aliens
(emphasis added) with obscure missions." The Romanians were challenged to
leave the area: "You have poisoned our and our children's souls."34 The
threats and insults to the Romanians
continued, the windows of their houses were broken35,
lists were made with the addresses of the
Romanians - there existed organized groups who entered the blocks of flats and
noted all the Romanian names36 - so
that the Hungarians would know were to find them in the event of a possible
"St. Bartholomew's Night". A Romanian individual from Sfantu Gheorghe stressed, in
relation to the existing atmosphere: "A cross was drawn on my door and I
used to receive 20 phone calls a day, culminating with curses and the coffin.
Often they told me: 'In two hours we'll be at your place; why are you still
here?'."37 Maria Oprea from Targu Secuiesc confessed: "A
man from this town threatened to cut my throat."38
The phone calls of the kind “1The time has come, your're dead. But there's no place in the cemetery for you' would
come one after the other, terrifying those who refused to leave their homes.”39 At some enterprises, the Szeckler
and Magyar directors and foremen insulted the Romanian workers, as for
instance, at FPL Covasna. The managers here addressed their Romanian underlings as follows:
"Go to Moldavia. Go to hell! You are Moldavians and we don't need
you."40 At Targu Secuiesc,
Cristuru Secuiesc, Sf. Gheorghe, Odorhei and in other, smaller localities the
Romanians were treated worse than the lepers had been in the Middle Ages. A Romanian woman in Covasna testified: "After the
Revolution, we could not go out as everyone pushed us and spat upon us, and
even the children would throw stones at us."41 When
the mistreated Romanians tried to reply, the same retort would come: "If
you dont' like it here, go to your Moldavia! What are you doing here, among
Hungarians?"42 Said Emilia Achim, a working woman of Sf. Gheorghe;
"They used to tell me that was little Hungary that it was their country
not ours."43 The Szecklers and
Magyars behaved in the same way towards pupils in the final years of school.
Veronica Ramon from Sf. Gheorghe said: "Wherever we went and they
heard us speak Romanian, they started to call us names. It is not only I that
left for that reason, but most graduates realized we will never get on well
with them.”44 These people had no one to
go to for protection, because there was general chaos at the level of
order-maintaining bodies, and those who had been kept on in the same jobs were
scared and afraid to intervene. Some localities in the
two counties had no police for weeks on end.45
The bodies created after the events of December 1989 were mostly made up of
Szecklers and Magyars who could not be made to show any sympathy for the
Romanians’ plight. On December 31, 1989, Pataki Imre,
one of the Hungarian leaders, informed: "In certain places there occur
manifestations of persecution against the Romanian police personnel. In two
communes - Danesti and Capalnita - police bodies do not operate (...) At the
polyclinic there came a Hungarian student from Cluj and one named Horea
Moldovan, who ordered that all Romanians be fired from the County
Hospital."46 In the meeting of
January 2, 1990 the same character stressed that the people in Odorhei had
decided that the Hungarian Republic should represent the Hungarian minority,
and that at Cristur the road signs in Romanian had been removed, only the
Hungarian ones being left in place. Everything
ended with these statements, no measures being taken to protect the Romanians, who
were subjected to unimaginable pressures. Seeing that everything was permitted,
that no law was observed any longer, certain Hungarians passed to direct
aggression against the Romanians. Thus lawyer Maria Pagu from Cristur was
bullied and mugged by an unknown man who then fled to Hungary but returned
later and threatenened her with a rifle.47
Even the Orthodox believers were pressured. Said
priest loan Toba: "On April 15, when we were making preparations for
Easter, all Romanians were threatened that, if they went to church on Easter
night, fire would be set to the church."48
Many houses of the Romanians were marked with the
German swastika or with the hammer and the sickle.49
Aggressions against Romanians continued so that on September 29, 1990
priest loan Toba from Cristur was again threatened. His report is eloquent: "On September 29, 1990 a Hungarian individual armed
with a knife and a screwdriver, Maine Gyorgy, a lathe operator at IOSF, came to
the rectory and threatened me he would make mince meat of me if he saw I
received guests."50
At
Odorhei, on one of the days after the December 1989 events, a Hungarian priest
said very self-assuredly: "We'll have no peace here until Hungary
intervenes."51 In the Odorhei
area the nationalist-chauvinistic actions were very rough - we have listed in
another chapater also the beastly murder in this area- the testimony of a
Romanian woman being quite convincing: "The people in Odorhei are
different than those in Miercurea-Ciuc or Gheorghieni. The
Szecklers in Odorhei are much more vainglorious, more aggressive. Even before,
in Odorhei there had been such an atmosphere."52
At Sandominic, Baraolt, Odorhei, on the occasion of
various manifestations, it was said: "Romania is free and the Romanians
must leave Transylvania", "If you don't leave here, we'll kill
you", "Szeckler brothers, our time has come".53 They
sang the Szeckler anthem and hoisted Hungarian flags,54
while the Romanians remained hidden, expecting to be ill-treated any moment. The policemen in
the area knew the situation well, but they could do nothing, as they feared the
reaction of the local people. Tnus, a police officer from Harghita showed:
"The people of Magyar nationality offend the Romanians, calling them names
like 'stinking Romanians'. Also they put pressure on the Romanians to leave the
enterprises or other jobs, because, as they say, Miercurea-Ciuc is Hungarian
territory."55 Armed groups went to some Romanian people's houses,
as in the case of Marin Bivolaru from Odorhei, whom some 30-40 persons armed
with clubs and crowbars wanted to beat. They looked for him at his neighbour's
house, thinking he was there.56 These violent actions are explained by a teacher from
Harghita county: "They wanted to revenge themselves on the Romanians
because we had come there, they considered it was their territory and we had no
right to come and live among them."57
In
counties Harghita and Covasna, just like in the other counties of Romania,
housing was very scarce. The solution found by the majority population there
was to drive away the Romanians and move into their houses. Voices were often
heard saying: "Let's oust all the stinking Romanians and then we'll have
houses."60 So that a Romanian was rightly wondering"
"After the events - the changes of December 1989 (emphasis added)
-, did they have the right to sing the Szecklers anthem? Did they have the
right to sing At the foot of Harghita he the Romanians imprisoned61 Did they have the right to draw up
lists of the Romanian families in each block of flats? They
pushed things so far that a Hungarian daily in Odorhei wrote that no persons
bearing Latin names must be seen in the town.62
The Romanians were desperate for support but they were left to solve the
problems by themselves: "There was no one to go to: at the Town Hall there
were only representatives of the Hungarian ethnic party -UDMR (...) There was
an authority vacuum there."63
Now here is another suggestive testimony reflecting the tension and
terror at that time: "Many of the Romanians had not gone out for a week,
some had taken a vacation, others were on sick leave and still others simply
did not go to work. All were scared because in the factories their Hungarian
colleagues were nasty to them and cursed them."64 Discrimination was obvious even
in shops where the shop assistants would not help the Romanians because they
did not speak Hungarian. In this connection, Ion Lungu
said "Discrimination began at shopping, because we were not addressing the
shop assistants in Hungarian. In the street, they would scoff at me when they
heard me speak Romanian. Because of the atmosphere and the stress, I could not
go on living there."65 In many cases, the Romanians were simply chased from the
lines so they could not buy their oil and sugar ration.66 Posters reading for instance,
"We invite all Romanians to leave the town by January 5" multiplied,
this psychological war being maintained permanently. Actually, the
anti-Romanian actions in counties Harghita and Covasna had begun at least two
weeks before December 22. The statement of a member
of the police - who subsequently left the area (emphasis added) - is
quite convincing: "At Odorhei, the revolution did not begin on December
22, it had been prepared two weeks before, when they had begun doing certain
things: they set fire to the warehouse of the furniture factory behind the
police station, cars were coming from abroad to incite them, and instances of
sabotage and arson were recorded."67
After the outbreak of the events, to make things
clear for the Romanians, at a meeting, Istvan Ciuta told them flatly: "At
Odorhei we have no tradition of the Romanians and Hungarians living side by
side."68 It was normal that, in
such circumstances, the interpersonal relations deteriorate, as highlighted by
a Romanian teacher from Harghita: "I can say that
after December 22 a radical change occurred in these relations - between
Romanians and Hungarians (emphasis added). If before they had talked to us
in Romanian, after that they showed their true colours. They have this mood
that makes them dislike the Romanians."69
At
this point we shall use several examples of the way the Romanians in the two
counties were aggressed, to prove that chauvinism and nationalism were
blatantly manifest in that zone. On January 9, a Romanian person travelling by
train arrives at Tusnad and, as soon as he is on the platform he is stopped by
a Hungarian who tells him that if he ever sees him again he will kill him.70 After the interethnic conflicts in
Targu Mures, the priest Ciprian Manea from Baraolt was warned: "Have you seen on tv how that man in Targu Mures was
beaten? Stinking Romanian, tomorrow it's your turn! If you don't leave the town
in 24 hours, we'll set fire to your house."71
Dumitru Visan from Sf. Gheorghe reported: "In the
evening of December 17, 1990, around 7.30 p.m. (...) a man with a stocking on
his head, with a pump or something, threw paint in my wife's eyes. The traces
can still be seen inside and outside the flat.72
On March 21, 1990, on the occasion of a meeting
organized at Baraolt, Remus Socea, a forestry engineer, Liviu Baidac, a teacher
at the Basani school, Aurel Vartolomei, secretary at the Baraolt town hall, and
Toma Tamasila, a teacher at the Baraolt high school,73 were taken to the centre of the
town and put on a platform. Several thousands of Hungarians, led by Benko
losif, chairman of the UDMR branch, Kagy Alexandru and Nagy Rozalia, shouted
frenzically: "Let's hang them!", "Let's drink Romanian blood!".
The Romanians subjected to this treatment were
accused of being members of Vatra Romaneasca (the Romanian Hearth,
an apolitical, nongovernmental organization of the Romanians in Transylvania
based on cultural principles, which was believed to pursue to oppose the UDMR -
a.a.) and were forced to read a comunique announcing the dissolution of the
local branch.74 The Cristea
family from Baraolt was subjected to all sorts of pressures, the man being
threatened with death while his wife was put on an open truck and surrounded by
30-40 Szecklers and Maghyar who insulted her for minutes on end, after which
they told her she had two days to leave the locality. The priest Aurel Suciu
from the second Sf. Gheorghe parish was forced to leave his job and home:
engineer Bradea from the Ghelnifa drilling rig was assaulted with a knife
because he was speaking Romanian. The police personnel and their families were
threatened and molested.
Thus, major Gheorghe Mucenic's wife was threatened by a Hungarian with
death; the son of Lt-Col. Constantin Dorobantu was beaten twice for the mere
fact of being a Romanian; captain Vasile Tilvescu was aggressed and chased from
the shop where he was trying to buy food with his ration book.75 Gheorghe Tofan, although a
cripple, was aggressed at his home; priest loan Bercu from Targu Secuiesc was
called "a dirty Romanian, this one who has hair on his tongue must be
skinned alive"; and there was even an attempt by a car to run him down. The Orthodox priest from Baraolt, driven away from the
parish, confessed: "That's how I came to wander, to be some sort of exile
in my own country, to leave forcefully a parish (...) and look now for a vacant
position in Maramures, in northern Romania."76
In many cases, the aggressions were perpetrated by organized groups, as the
case was at Cristuru Secuiesc. Said an eye-witness:
"They went uptown and arrived at the home of Miss Maria Pizgu who had been
a lawyer with the IOSF for seven years. They broke her door and soiled the
house with blood."77 In
the railway stations and bus terminals in counties Harghita and Covasna, many
Romanians were molested by extremists. This is
what engineer Ion Gradinaru stated in this respect: "On January 4, 1990 we
went to Miercurea-Ciuc and they didn't even want to sell us bus tickets to
Vlahita. At the railway station there were some young men who molested us, and
my wife was pregnant."78
Both in 1990 and in the
first months of 1991, there were frequent cases of aggression perpetrated on
trains; on April 9, 1990, in the train 4014 two young Hungarian men aggressed
several Romanians when the train was at the Izvoru Olt station. In the night of June 20, 1990, at the same railway
station a group of seven unidentified Hungarians aggressed several Romanians;
on October 23, 1990, while waiting for the bus at the Izvoru Olt stop, several
Romanian workers from the Balan Mining Enterprise were beaten by four young
Hungarians from Sandominic and Carta, the reason being their speaking Romanian;
in the evening of February 16, 1991, on train 4014, a group of 20-30 young
Szecklers and Magyars, all travelling without tickets, aggresscd the conductor
and the police patrol when they arrived at the station, throwing stones and
bricks at them.79 At Sf. Gheorghe, seven Hungarians insulted and molested
the police patrol made up of Romanians.80
At Odornei, Aurel Bors - chief of the municipal Police, was violently molested
on April 25, 1990 by unknown persons near his home; on November 23, 1990 the
non-commissioned officer Petru Cosarca was beaten by Hing Tibor from Zetea.
The
atmosphere of terror against the Romanians was permanently marked by such acts,
the political party of the Szecklers and Magyars, the UDMR, failing to take any
stand. More than that, it is considered that such chauvinistic acts were mere
fiction and that the interpersonal relations in the two counties were normal.
And, in order to be even more convincing, we shall cite still more examples. Thus, loan Donose, an auto mechanic at Dacia Service
in Targu Secuiesc, was molested by Mike Sandor because he was a Romanian;
Mugurel Grigorescu, a forest guard living in the same locality, was threatened
with death and was insulted in order to be made to leave the town; because he
was speaking Romanian, loan Calin, an oilman working at the Ghelnita drilling
rig, was threatened with a knife by a Szeckler who told him he would be killed
unless he spoke Hungarian.81 In the commune Praid, the Roman-Catholic priest was
aggressed and the windows of his house were broken.82
On Christmas Day, several Szecklers and Magyars
surrounded the church in Targu Secuiesc, alleging that there was a terrorist
there, and they took the believer Constantin Miricioiu to the town hall, under
escort. He was released only when the priest intervened.83 On March
27, 1990, around 1.30 p.m. the wife of priest
loan Toba from Cristur was aggressed by farming engineer Mateffy Joseph and by
a Hungarian railway worker; the latter said: "Where is the priest? Our gang
wants your blood. We'll kill you and hang you by the three crosses on the domes
of the church."84 At Sandominic, they assaulted veterinary Gheorghe
Radulescu, who was cuffed and asked to kiss their feet.85 In all towns of the two counties, it
was a real adventure for Romanians to walk in the streets after dark. Thus, Mihaela Balaci from Covasna county stated:
"In January when I was returning from the movies I was stopped in the street
by three young Hungarians who, asking for a match, wanted to see if we were
Romanians or Hungarians. Realizing we were Romanians, they aggressed us,
cuffing and cursing us."86
Valentin Cancel, a worker at the Oltui Textile Enterprise of Sf. Gheorghe,
described his terrible experience: "I was aggressed and hit at the cinema,
because I was speaking Romanian. At night unknown
people would come and knock at the door, threatening to kill us. After such an
incident, my wife, who was pregnant, gave birth to the baby prematurely, and
was in hospital for five weeks, as long as it took to save the baby (...). At
work, if I said anything that didn't agree with them, they would say: 'Stay
home if you don't like it here."87
Extreme measures were taken, particularly against those who were members
in cultural or political organizations such as Vatra Romaneasca, Liga
Democratica Romana, Concordia, etc.91
Here is what a Romanian said about the situation, from this point of view, in a
locality in Covasna county: "The Catholic priest came with someone from
the UDMR and they chased the mayor and the secretary. The
only instigator is the priest Bartalos Zoltan. There is no other political
grouping except the UDMR having its quarters at the town hall, for several
months everything has been written only in Hungarian (...) We tried to set up
the FSN branch but we found no understanding in Sf. Gheorghe. We tried with a
liberal organization (...). With several Romanians we tried to set up an
organization there, but they all rejected it, saying they were afraid."92 In many cases when the Romanians
were driven away, it was notably the Szeckler and Magyar intelligentsia that
was involved.
Teacher Daniel Radu testified: "The Magyar intelligentsia played
the most important role in these events (...). At the beginning, in January,
immediately, there was a frenetical attempt to get rid of the Romanians."93 The officials said, even
on tv, that the Romanians left willingly, and by
no means that they were driven away. These statements were made, especially by
UDMR representatives, to the end of concealing the truth about this exodus;
most of those who left specified that they were actually chased away from the
places where they had lived for a long time. Many families left their homes of
25 years due to the tensions created by the majority population after December
22, 1989.94 And, in order not to be
accused of falseness, we shall reproduce further the statements of some people
directly involved in the events: "We had to leave almost overnight, although we had two children going to school. We
could not live with the axe threatening us, it was not a solution. At school,
the children were just monitored by an older pupil. So that we decided to leave
and go no matter where."95
"We left Odorheiu Secuiesc because we
wanted to live in a better climate enabling us to study undisturbed, we felt
the need for warmth and kindness not for jeers, fear
and an uncertain future."96
"I consider myself driven away by terror."97
"I may say we were forced by the circumstances to leave our homes. I think the reason is first that we are
Romanians and, second, that we adhered to Vatra Romaneasca.”98 "Right after
me meeting - the one at Baraolt (a.a.) - we packed our bags, taking whatever
could be taken in a hurry, and we went to the plant to ask for help. Now we
have a room rented from on old woman who has two
very small rooms deprived of any comfort (...). We had some very difficult
moments (...). My father, seeing the situation, the way we were turned into
exiles in our own country (...), he had a heart attack and died."99 "There's no telling what a
shock it is to me that, suddenly, from a
comfortable 3-room flat, I have had to move to a house where there's no hot
water."100 "I can say that
at Baraolt there is no Romanian family left. All were forced to go." These
statements mirror an unimaginably dramatic situation, an intolerance which a Romanian teacher explains as follows: "I
think there will never be peace in Transylvania (...). It's very difficult to
understand why one can't live alongside the Hungarians (...) You can understand
it only if you live there."101 The priest loan Toba described the
circumstances in which he left: "I could not resist any longer (...) I had
to run away one night, my daughter was threatened in Cluj, at boarding
school."102 At Cristur, out of 110 Romanian families only21 - mostly
mixed families stayed on.103 Among
those who left were the families of: Mihai
Calagaritoiu, Costel Botosan, Grigorc Popa, Valeriu Costca, Dan Dragomir, Ion
Haiduc, Constantin Lazar. Hie Pop, Costel Popescu, loan Balaban, Purvulescu,
teacher Mihaela lonescu, eng. Zaharia Cicerone, eng. Mihai Barsan, teacher
Diana Neamtu.104 To ensure a legal
justification, in many cases the company management forced those driven away to
sign statements showing that they did not leave forcedly or for political
reasons. Economist Rodica Cerevcov from Miercurea-Ciuc showed: "The fact was very humiliating to me, as to all Romanians
who left Harghita county, that, seeing us forced to ask for transfer to a job
elsewhere, approval of this transfer was made subject to our writing a
statement showing explicitly that we were not leaving for political reasons.
We, I mean my family, did not want to leave Miercurea-Ciuc. We had our honest
14-years' work. We invested 60,000 lei only in
fitting the flat we had rented."105
Great pressure was put on this woman after March 15, 1990 when, being on sick
leave, she was accused she was a member of Vatra Romaneasca.106 So that she had every reason to say: "When we went there, we
did so considering them friends, but it is an injustice to be driven away after
14 years of honest work as if you were scum. Why should my child be beaten at school for being Romanian?"107 Another Romanian forced to leave
specified: "I feel I am denied my right, as a human and a citizen, to live
where I am entitled tolive."108
Construction workers were subjected to the same pressures to make them
leave the two counties. Some of them stated: "...we had been working there
for 20 years and they said - the Szecklcrs and the Magyars - (emphasis
added) - that now, after we had built all the blocks of flats in town and the
schools, we could not live there anymore, and
our children were chased from schools."109
By May 5, 1990, 167 Romanians had left Odorhei, plus over 200 students from the
high schools in this municipality.110
In localities like Targu Secuiesc, Ozun or Baraolt, gangs of young Szecklers
and Magyars were organized, which disturbed the
public order, threatening the Romanians and committing acts of vandalism - an
eloquent example being the gang of rockers from
Targu Secuiesc.111 In Sfantu Gheorghe was set up the organization
called "The Orchestra", aimed at driving all Romanians away from the
town and the environs.112 At the
Woodworking Plant of Sfantu Gheorghe, hundreds of Romanians were forced to move
to other counties, since they were told there was no work to be done by them.
Of course, like in other cases, they were made to sign papers attesting that
they were leaving of their own accord. At some point, 543 persons had left
Harghita, of whom 444 had done so because of the pressures they had been subjected to. Among them there were 156
teachers, 5 lawyers, 4 priests, 20 engineers, 8 economists, 54 members of the
staff of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, 10 belonging to the personnel of the
Ministry of National Defense, 53 workers. By the same time, Covasna had ben
left by 911 persons, 760 of whom did so because of the pressures. They included
258 teachers, 17 actors, 8 lawyers, 89 engineers, 10 economists, 68 persons on
the payroll of the MIA, and 49 persons working for the MND.113 Because population records in
several localities - Miercurea Ciuc, Odorhei, Gheorgheni, Targu Secuiesc, etc -
were destroyed and the main positions in the bodies of the local administration
were held by Szecklers and Magyars interested in concealing the truth, it was
impossible to establish very accurately the number of people who left the two counties. The number was estimated at 3000-4000
persons, but on March 18, 1991 there existed concrete data for 1758 people -
approximately 651 families, including 475 teachrs, 149 engineers, subengineers,
130 personnel of the MIA.114 Several
people asserted that the action of driving away the
Romanians was coordinated in both counties115
and, on the other hand, that this action became more
intense as the Szecklers and Magyars travelled to Hungary - in 1990 alone,
95,483 applications were lodged and all were favourably solved.116
The plight of the Romanians led to the organization of the National Comittee of
the Romanians having fled certain localities in Transylvania”.117
Unfortunately, some of
the Romanians who fled Transylvania did not always find understanding in the
new towns where they moved. This is what a family stated: "The local
authorities disregarded the circumstances in which we had been forced to leave;
moreover, we were offended, and we had our belongings in two places, at my
parents, and at my in-laws and we are living in two rooms with two old people.
As for the Hungarians, I know some whom the UDMR helped to obtain a flat. We
did not leave willingly, before the revolution
we would have never thought of leaving. In Gheorgheni we abandoned a flat we
had fitted with all the comforts (...) but no one wants to understand this or
may be they cannot understand, so we felt as strangers among the Szecklers but
we feel the same now among the Romanians, whom we expected to behave
differently."118
The departures of the Romanians from the two counties took place in a
climate of general insecurity - in one of the counties 15 murders, 15 attempted
homicides, 8 indecent assaults, 2 rapes and 18 robberies being recorded. 119
As
a conclusion to the above, we could use the words of a priest who had to leave
Harghita county: "The revolutionaries" - lie refers to the Szecklers
and Magyars - "rose not against communism, the dictatorship and the
totalitarian regime, but against the Romanian population, wishing to make there
a purely Hungarian zone, by cleansing it of all that was Romanian. Churches,
graves, crosses, the memorials of Romanian heroes, such as the memorial of
Romanian hero Vasile Moromete, were desecrated. The mausoleum of Odorheiu
Secuiesc was broken and the bones were scattered in the field."120
A very interesting
element demonstrating the chauvinistic extremism of the actions that took place
after December 22, 1989 in counties Harghita and Covasna, was the action of
changing the names of certain streets in all localities. And, although the
Government of Romania indicated the way this had to be done - only the names
having to do with the communist period were to be changed - the action was
radical in both counties. Almost all Romanian
names were replaced with the names of Magyar or Szeckler personalities. Thus,
on February 3, 1990, when the street names had been altered, from 24 streets
having received new names, only two bore the names of Romanian personalities -
M. Eminescu and N. Cioflec - all the other being Hungarian.121 In Covasna county several
resolutions were issued in this connection - resolution 31 of Feb. 2, 1990 relative to the changing of the names of
certain schools, resolution 39 of July 7, 1990, resolution 128 of June 13, 1990
relative to the new names to be given to the park and to certain streets122 - which had no legal foundation but
which, once applied, were no longer rescinded. In December 1990, the secretary
of the Covasna Prefect's Office stressed that there was no legal foundation for
the new names. Nevertheless, nothing was done, certain leading members of the
Prefect's Office warning that the reaction of public opinion - the Szecklers
and the Magyars (a.a.) - would be very harsh
should changes be operated. The Government of Romania repeatedly warned the
leadership of the prefect's offices in the two counties, the only result until
now being the arguments of this kind: "The names were changed following
the proposal of the town halls in the case of streets the names of which were
related to the communist system and of streets for which a return to the
traditional names was desired."123
Thus, in Gheroghcni, of 23 new street names only
one is a Romanian name, i.e. Mihai Eminescu; "124
likewise, at Cristuru Secuiesc only one street received a Romanian name, and in
Odorhei, of the 18 streets the names of which were changed, no street received
a Romanian name, at least in the first stage of the action (here are some of
the names of Magyar personalities: Kossuth Lajos, Banyai Janos, Inecslaszlo,
HaaszRezso, losifBem, Petofi Sandor, KosKaroiy). The
Government's address no.2 of March 1, 1991 and March 4, which showed that the
provisions of Decree 100/1990 were violated through the new names adopted125, indirectly received the following answer from the Prefect
of Covasna county, Fodor Francisc: "The decisions made at the top and at
the county seat should not be altered in the ensuing period."126 And "We must take into account
the atmosphere in the county. The change of the names
at this moment - March 15, 1991 - will have an inciting effect. The timing is
not good and can trigger off various manifestations."127 In the
same line of thought, in most localities in the
two counties, the Hungarian name was written in large letters (30-40 cm) and
the Romanian one in small letters (5-15 cm). The same holds true for commercial
or economic units.128
In the two counties
there took place actions aimed at misleading the central institutions, the
reports saying that in that zone the peace was total and things were normal. In
Harghita county, at the meeting of the Executive Bureau of the National
Salvation Front, held in January-April 1990, the problem was not even mentioned
of discussing the anti-Romanian phenomena
occurring at that time, these being ignored. The
Prefect's Office sent a list of the members of the former County Bureau of the
Romanian Communist Party and part of the former members of the political
police, presenting them as the only people to have left Miercurea-Ciuc.129
Szecklers and Magyars moved immediately into
the houses where the Romanians who left Harghita and Covasna had been tenants.
In many cases it was known beforehand who would leave and who would move into
the dwellings, which made many of those driven away consider-normally - that
there had been an organized action at the level of the two counties, 134 Because, also in the case of certain economic units, the argument used by the managers
to explain why certain Romanians were no longer allowed to work there was this:
"It has been unanimously voted that they should not get a job in this
county."135
The chairmen and the members of the committees
of certain organizations that were joined by Romanians were threatened
immediately after the setting up of those organizations. Thus, the chairman of
the non political organization called the "League of Reserve Officers from
Sfantu Gheorghe" was warned over the phone: "Why on earth are you
rallying the officers? In Hungary there is no such league! Mind it, or you'll
be hanged!"136
After the events of December, in counties
Harghita and Covasna the bookstores had very few books in Romanian to sell.137 The same holds true about
Romanian-language newspapers and reviews: only a
small number of these was on sale and besides, some were bought to be burnt in
order to prevent Romanians from reading them.138
Daily Adevarul Harghitei of April 18, 1991 carried a protest reading, among others: "Through the press
sales section of the former County Post Department, our daily, like other
Romanian central publications, is sold in Miercurea-Ciuc only at four
stalls."139
An important role in
enhancing the interethnic conflictual situation in the two counties was played
by street manifestations that began to be organized immediately after the
events of December 1989. Mention should be made that in most cases these
manifestations degenerated into nationalist and irredentist anti-Romanian
actions.
In
Odorhei, Sfantu Gheorghe, Miercurea-Ciuc, Baraolt, Cristuru Secuiesc, the
extremists shouted slogans in favour of autonomy of Transylvania and the
annexation of this territory to Hungary, the Szeckler anthem was sung,
Hungarian flags were hoisted.140 All these manifestations hurt the national feelings of
the Romanians in the area; those holding
speeches reiterated the idea that the minorities' rights had been overlooked in
the past and no compromise should be hence accepted.141 The Hungarian symbols were
hoisted everywhere. This is what a teacher from
Odorhei declared: "On March 19, 1990, I
was in Odorhei were I lived; on March 15th, the demonstrations were accompanied
by the festive "Adornment" of the schools, medical units, of the
parks, of the shops with the colours of the Hungarian state142, and cockades, sashes and pennons
in red, white and green were to be seen all over the
place. Many of the slogans shouted then had an anti-Romanian character:
"Horthy, Horthy!", "Long live Hungary", "Transylvania
is Hungarian land".143 In
Praid, the Romanian flags were torn, the school windows were smashed, and
Hungarian flags were hoisted all over the place-144 During the various manifestations,
assertions were made that the Magyars in Romania
are not a nationality, an ethnic minority, but a Transylvanian nation and, at
the same time, part of the unitary Magyar nation.145
In Balvanyos and Zagon, large people's meetings were held, wherefrom the
Romanians were driven away. Celebrating the 157th of March, the Magyars in
Gheorghieni hoisted the Hungarian flag on every institution, and the participants
in the manifestations were wearing
Several demonstrations took place in Odorhei, on March 15th, occasioned
by the celebration of the Magyar bourgeois-democratic revolution. In the
"Tamasi Aron" square, a monument carved in wood was placed, featuring
two flags: the Romanian and the Hungarian one. The next day, the Romanian flag
was gone, but the Hungarian one was hoisted there for almost a week.154 And then, taking into account the
significance of March 15 to the Romanians, a voice
raised, asking: "Are we, the ones in Transylvania, supposed to celebrate
those who killed our forefathers in 1848?"155
(In 1948, after the defeat of the Romanians'
revolution for social and national emancipation,
over 40,000 Romanians were killed by the Magyar army; among those killed, were
women, children and old people). In schools the Magyar teachers and pupils were
wearing the three colours of Hungary,156
whereas the Romanias would spend days on end locked
in the houses, afraid of the reprisals. The Magyar flags were hoisted on almost every public institution -
townhalls, schools, medical units, commercial units - even on private houses157; many of those flags had been
made at the textile enterprise "Oltul" in St. Gheorghe.158 At those events a great number of
citizens from Hungary took part. They crossed in large numbers the border with
Romania and hoisted, along their way, the Hungarian state symbols, removing the
Romanian inscriptions, as if the Hungarian borders had spread over night. On March 14th, a large demonstration was organized by the
Catholic priests, and the next day, carts, riders, buses, all of them led by
the Hungarian flag, went to the tomb of Gabor Aron,159
to lay down wreaths of flowers. The same day, March
15, at the interesction of the road leading to Augustin-Racos-Capreni, 160 hundreds of Szecklers
and Magyars laid down flowers where the old border between Romania and the
Austro-Hungarian state had been. More than once assertions were made that the
counties of Harghita and Covasna would be called, in 1992,
On
the backround of the forementioned events, inter-ethnical conflicts appeared in
Targu Mures, taking the shape of a violent outbreak of the conflicting state
existing, previously, in a latent shape. Some of the causes generating those
conflicts are: the issuing of the Programme-platform of the UDMR as early as
December, and the launching of notion of self-determination for the Magyar
minority in Romania; the actions initiated by the UDMR leaders concerning
education and centering on the idea of total separation of the Magyar and
Romanian education system; the organization, by the UDMR on February 10th,
1990, of a "silence" demonstration in Tg. Mures, where the
participants held candels and books edited in Hungary, most of which featuring
the title "Transylvania is Hungarian Land"; the intensification of
political confusion along with the ever more frequent contacts between the UDMR
leaders and the political circles in Hungary. Political programmes of some
political parties in Hungary were brought to Romania; those programmes included
claims pertaining to the solving of the national problem and territorial
rights. On an international level, the situation of the Magyar minority in
Romania was purposefully distorted, and the reports referred, among other things,
to the fact that Romanian language had always represented a means of oppression
to the Magyars. Before the open conflicts that took place in Targu Mures, there
had been a period of psychological training of the Magyar population, by means
of various demonstrations; the UDMR was directly involved in this action. On
March 15th, 1990 the participants in the demonstrations held at Targu Mures,
Sovata, Albesti were wearing cockades featuring the effigies of Kossuth and
Petofi, framed by the Magyar colours, the Hungarian flag was hoisted in public
places, institutions or blocks of flats. On March 16th, 1990, at the Chemist's
Shop no. 28 in Tg. Mures , the Romanians were not attended by the
shop-assistant Kormoczi, as she claimed that the shop was only destined to
Magyar customers. After this incident, a demonstration of the Romanians took
place in Tg. Mures, near the polyclinic; a Trabant driven by Nagy Samuel
deliberately ran into the participants at a maximum speed hitting 12 persons, 3
of which were seriously injured. On March 19th, 1990, in front of the
headquarters of the Magyar ethnic party - UDMR - in Tg. Mures , a meeting of
the Magyars took place; Suto Andras addressed the participants. As a reaction
to this manifestation, the Romanians gathered in the central area of the town,
asking for the resignation of Kineses Elod, Kiroly Karoly, Tokes Andras and
Suto Andras, known as nationalist extremists. The Romanians approached the UDMR
headquarters, where they were attacked by the Magyars with bottles, stones and
other hard objects. The headquarters of several parties were devastated and the
writer Slito Andras was badly injured. On March 20th, 1990, the centre ofTg.
Mures was occupied by the Magyars, who, led by the UDMR, asked for tlie
recognition of some of their claims; in case those claims were not granted,
they threatened with a general strike. The strike had been, nevertheless,
declared, and all the Romanians were stopped from going to work. In front of
the "Grand" Hotel, 10-15,000 Magyars were shouting: "It's now or
never", "Now and here", "Away with Vatra Romaneasca";
leaders of this manifestation were Kineses Elod, Jacob Attila, Jlyes Kinga. All
kinds of appeals were addressed to the Magyars: "Be careful, if the army
won't stand by us, disarm them!", "Get them for we are more!"
"Don't throw anything you might need later. The Magyars attacked the
Romanians with crowbars, chains with balls, slings with metal balls, incendiary
bottles, many of them being made at the enterprises in town: IMATEX, IRUNCO,
"Metalotehnica", "Electromures", "AJIRAM". Both
the Romanians and the Magyars sent several messages throughout the county; as a
result, groups of Romanians from Hodac and Ibanesti came to Tg. Mures, as well
as Magyars from Miercurea Nirajului, Vargata, Sovata and Eromitu. In some
localities around Tg. Mures, such as Dumbravioara, Ernei, Sangeorzu de Mures,
the Magyars blocked the roads, controlling the traffic and illtreating the
Romanians they met on the way. Some of the Romanians from Hodac and Ibanesti
did not even get to" Tg.Mures, as they were surrounded by the Magyars who
injured them and destroyed their vehicles. 300 citizens were injured, 67 per
cent of which were of Romanian nationality.
We
made a detailed presentation of the events in Tg.Mures, between 15 and 21 of
March, 1990, because the following events in Harghita and Covasna were closely
connected to the forementioned ones. Moreaver, in 1991 a book entitled
"Black March in Tg.Mures" was released at Sfantu Gheorghe. Its
author, Kineses Elod, one of the leaders of the nationalist and secessionist
Hungarian movement, responsible for the genocide in Tg. Mures, was trialed and
charged with murder. He was subsequently amnestied for political reasons. He
was directly involved in the events in Tg. Mures and considered that the
Romanians were the only ones responsible. This is an excerpt from the preface
signed by Slito Andras (a Magyar writer living in Romania; his novels, short
stories and plays are considered to be some exceptional works of the socialist
realistic genre. He is one of the communist writers whose work is even
mentioned in school handbooks): "This book is a
genuine confession - (which we doubt) - over one of the most terrible dramas
experienced by the Magyars in Romania in late 20th century. Kineses Elod took a
risk by evoking the sanguinary days of March 1990 lived by the town of Tg.
Mures; he describes the pogrom against the citizens. Those responsible for this
pogrom, whom we can accuse of cunning and a talent for genocide, took advantage
of their situation and then blamed everything on the Transylvanian
Magyars"162. As early as the
frontpages extremely strong terms are used-"pogrom",
"genocide", the authors ignoring the fact that the number of Romanian
victims was far larger than that of Magyar ones, and that the tatter's
aggresions went on for a long period of time. Towards the end of the book, a
cross-examination of the Romanians who were caught is presented-just think
about the state they were in-; a group of Magyars forced them to
"admit" the fact that the ones to blame were only the Romanians. Had
the Romanians threatened the Magyars the same' way, all the international
bodies, the UNO included, would have been notified in short time for the
unobservance of the people's rights in Romania. We are certain that the book
mentioned above will be soon translated in a widespread language. And again the
Romanians will be seen as nationalist, chauvinistic, anti-Magyar etc. This,
together with the interviews of the Magyar representatives in the USA, Canada,
France-where they miss no chance to point to the idea that the Magyars are
persecuted in Romania-would stand for an ideal propaganda instrument, meant to
distort Romania's image abroad.
Going back to
the events in Tg. Mures, we must point to the fact that during those days,
preparations were made in some localities in Harghita and Covasna to help the
Magyars. At Capeni, the Szeklers and the Magyars took clubs, axes, shovel
handles, chains163, and the pressure
exerted over the Romanians became unbearable. This is what Pop M. Elena stated:
"The former director from the IPL Sf. Gheorghe came and told me the
Romanians employees had warned him that the Magyars had only made clubs that
moming (...) I saw the demonstration from the window,
standing behind the curtain. The participants held Szeckler flags in red and
black. It was only later that I found out that meant blood until death."164
After March 15th, above the doorbells of every Romanian dwelling a sign
appeared in the shape of a blue cross165.
The demonstration that took place in Gheorghieni, Miercurea-Ciuc, Baraolt, Tg.
Secuiesc, Sf.
Another
street anti-Romanian demonstration took place in Miercurea-Ciuc on June 13th,
1990 as a retort to the events in Bucharest. At about 4.30p.m., a group of
people, among whom Bogoy Zsolt, AkosBenedek, Kanda Gergely, Juncsak Levente
came to the police headquarters asking them to replace the Romanian plate. They tore out the Romanian plate and they trod it
under their feet. Eventually, there were about 2,000 participants in this
demonstration. Although the plate was replaced, the participants started
shouting anti-Romanian slogans: "Lousy Romanians". "Iliescu,
don't forget Transylvania is not your land!"189
"Away with the Romanians!" "Now or never!". Among those who
incited people to violence there were intellectuals too, such as the case was
with Nagy Antal, a teacher, and other teachers present there. As we have
mentioned the details concerning this demonstration in a special chapter, we
would only like to
point to the fact that the Romanians' situation had worsened. A police officer said: "On June 13th, 1990, in
Miercurea-Ciuc, 10-15 Magyar citizens came after me at my former place of
residence."190 Even in
the Romanian Parliament, an interpellation was made: "After the expressed
attitudes of our colleagues in Transylvania about the Bucharest events of June
13-15, 1990, their families became the target of ceaseless attacks, hence being
forced to take refuge at their relatives and
friends. (...) These threats are obvious proofs that today, in Romania, only
one ethnic minority is threatened, aggressed and oppressed, namely the
Magyarized Romanians in Harghita and Covasna."191
It was of the few expressed attitudes as far as we know, when the matters were
outspoken, giving up diplomacy which had been meant to avoid the "hurting"
of the UDMR MPs.
On
August 15th, 1990, a demonstration took place in front of the St. Gheorghe
prefect's office; the Szecklers and the Magyars shouted their slogans and
forced their way into the courtyard of the institution.192
All the street
demonstrations of the Szecklers and Magyars co-ordinated by the UDMR had in
view: to cultivate the peoples distrust in the political leadership of the
country who had been accused of chauvinism; to artificially create a state of
general fear psychosis concerning the threat over the Magyar minority; to
spread irredentist theses regarding the autonomy of Transylvania and its
annexation to Hungary. No categorical retort was initiated by the Romanians in
the two counties, not even when they faced obvious nationalistic, chauvinistic
and irredentist manifestations, for fear of the violent actions that would have
followed. They nevertheless handed letters and
memoirs to the officials in Bucharest, to the new representative institutions
of the power; despite all these, in those difficult moments, the Romanian
citizens felt abandoned. Within this context, the "fait accompli"
policy of the UDMR gave excelent results, and the situation was eventually
settled, brought to "peace", a "peace" motivated as follows
by a Romanian woman: "Now they have no one to pick on-she was referring
to vioJent actions- as we are now only an element of decor."193
We
end this chapter quoting the words of school teacher Stefu Rodica who witnessed
the events: "I have never heard of one Magyar complaining he had been
driven away by the Romanians. I would surely want to hear someone say: The
Romanians sent us away. Why are they chasing us?"194
NOTES